The proposed Alcohol Control Bill’s rejection may have been influenced by concerns over its potential economic implications, such as double taxation on businesses and reduced revenue from limited sale hours.
The Bill’s rejection was largely due to constitutional concerns, particularly the potential violation of Article 93(a)(2) regarding financial implications on the consolidated fund.
The Bill aimed to address public health concerns, such as curbing illicit trade and prohibiting alcohol sales to minors, but its rejection may hinder efforts to regulate the alcohol industry.
The alcohol industry’s influence may have played a role in the Bill’s rejection, as major manufacturers supported certain provisions, such as time restrictions on sales.
The Bill’s rejection may have been due to concerns over creating regulatory confusion, as some provisions were deemed redundant or already covered by existing laws.
Despite the Bill’s rejection, its proposer, Hon. Sarah Opendi, plans to continue advocating for its passage and reintroduce it to Parliament.